Talk:Chaos (genus)

Protista Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos (amoeba) → Chaos (genus) —

Xxx (genus) is the standard disambiguation for genus disambiguations. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Deor (talk) 23:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edits to Amoeba (genus)

The article had been flagged as a stub, needing references. In supplying citations, I found it necessary to rewrite quite extensively. Also, I have added a section on the complicated history of the genus & its name, and a section on recent phylogenetic work.

Summary of changes:

Found citations to support claims in the existing article, and rewrote as needed. The often-repeated fact that Chaos can be up to 5 mm long applies only to one species, C. carolinensis, so I made that explicit.
Updated taxobox, removing the obsolete phylum Sarcodina
Removed paragraph on mitochondria. While the claim seems to be true (C. carolinensis can indeed have hundreds of thousands of mitochondria), and also notable (most cells have far fewer), the general discussion of the purpose & function of mitochondria, which made up most of the paragraph, does not belong in this article. I could not think of a way to insert the (admittedly interesting) fact concerning C's 500,000 mitochondria without interrupting the flow of other paragraphs (and the naked fact just seemed odd, standing on its own in a one-sentence paragraph). So, I removed that section, for now.
Replaced the Bibliography (which contained only one text, on the general subject of mitochondria) with an External links section, linking to pages with more information about Chaos.
Removed stub and refimprove tags

Deuterostome (talk) 16:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaos (genus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090610035748/http://www.bms.ed.ac.uk/research/others/smaciver/amoebae.htm to http://www.bms.ed.ac.uk/research/others/smaciver/amoebae.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C. carolinense or C. carolinensis?

There is some discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_25#Chaos_carolinense. – Uanfala (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An even more interesting case of disagreement about the correct gender of a genus name can be found at User talk:Dyanega#Notogramma cimiciforme/Notogramma cimiciformis. – Uanfala (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]